Skip to main content

the importance of not being earnest


Had one of those intransigent arguments with a friend the other day. It came out of a conversation where I tried to explain my feelings about writing, how they had evolved. Honestly I thought I was describing a kind of obvious progress. I talked about how there was something strangely liberating about coming to understand one's own place or station in the grand scheme of things, and that my own place was decidedly coach class, in that I was only ever going to have a certain amount of success (meaning: no money) and enjoy very specific kinds of victories (meaning: limited, sporadic publication). And that the writing itself was changing into something detached, something that had its own internal logic, and while it remains a complete pain in the ass, it's still an exercise that I'm drawn to, and I know that is good for me, in that it gives me certain things in return, at the very least a better understanding of the world, and of myself. At the same time though there is this moving away, this detachment, and I find myself less invested, especially after the moment when the thought or idea or story has been set down, and its success (publication, no money) is out of my hands, and matters less and less. 

Really, all I was saying is that pride is no longer an issue. But my friend did not believe me. My friend got very flustered and red in the face. Because my friend is that kind of person who does not like to hear anyone say things like that. And I know this kind of person very well. A million years ago, in design school, I had a similar argument with a blonde version of this person, when I made a comment about grades -- about how, in the end, they didn't really matter, because no one would ever see your transcript, so no one should ever get too worked up about them. And this little blonde girl just went crazy, stomping around, yelling WHY ARE YOU EVEN HERE THEN? WHY ARE YOU EVEN HERE IF YOU DON'T CARE? Because all she could take in was that I didn't care -- not that I didn't care in a very specific way. And this not-caring stuff makes certain kinds of people crazy.

It's a difficult position to defend, this not-caring stuff. Because a more accurate description would be not-caring-but-still-caring. I mean, you care enough to do the work in the first place. You have an idea that you follow through with, in a sustained-thought kind of way. You care enough to edit the work, to read it to other people, to submit it for publication. And you still hold publication as a specific kind of validation. But not the only kind. It is not a goal you pin hopes on. Because you know that your story may be flawed. You know that it might be in the wrong time, in the wrong geography. You know (too well) that the submission process may be flawed, or even crooked, and that the entire publishing industry may be completely broken, and mostly incoherent. So, if the work gets rejected, you're not going to go into the garage and shoot yourself in the face. 

In fact, you might be at the point where you forgot that you submitted the work in the first place. 

But yes, sure, all of this is a bit of a mask, and for most writers it's a hard one to wear. And my friend just happens to be that kind of person who can't even look at it. To her, it's hideous, and only bad people wear it. Because you're either trying or you're not. You're either in or you're out. You either care or you don't. It's either gold or it's shit. What are you, the kind of bastard who doesn't believe in things? Like ... recycling? Because you hate the earth? Because you're a bastard? Why even get out of bed in the morning if you think the planet is already doomed? 

And for me, people like this are EXHAUSTING. Maybe I'm just getting old. All I see are the seams of things, and their gaudy labels, and all the reasons why things are compromised. But I also try to understand that those things are beside the point, because who can listen to that, and who wants to carry all that around, so please let's just get on with whatever you need to do, and stop boring the rest of us with your earnestness. 

* * * * *

There is an audio version of this post here.

Comments

  1. amen, and happy new year :))

    ReplyDelete
  2. ooh - you just said stuff that I'm always thinking ... and sometimes say.. but don't bother much because it always gets received badly x

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

the indisputable weight of the ocean

People are always telling me that my work is too dark. So I've put up this sunnier story, but even it has a shadow, as its original publisher – a fine Atlantic Canadian literary magazine called the Gaspereau Review – is no longer in business. ---------------- It was a simple enough thing and that thing was simply this: Edmund Kelley was a gentleman. Of course his mom called him her 'little gentleman', as in 'Oh Edmund, you are my perfect little gentleman,' which did seem to hold to a certain logic that these type of things often follow, considering her affection for him and the fact that he was, after all, only ten years old. Still, Edmund himself was not particularly fond of the diminutive aspect of that title. Gentleman was enough; gentleman summed up the whole thing rather nicely, thank you. He was definitely a more refined version of your average child. He lived in a state of perpetual Sunday m

Oona Balloona (doesn't care about new tables)

Well, it's Friday, and since I'm pretty depleted in the chit-chat department, I might as well put up some pictures of Ol' Giggles At Ghosts before Grandma starts sending me hate mail. Man, what a goofball. At this rate it's going to be, like, eighteen years before she has gainful employment and moves out of the house. I mean, come on . * * * * * C is especially crazy and frantic today. About two months ago she decided that she no longer liked our dining room table (take that, dining room table! no more BFF for you!). Since then she's switched the dining room and kitchen table (and all the rest of the furniture in the house -- about thirty times, but that's another story) as a provisional solution while she scoured area stores for an upgrade. And she thought she had found one, on Wednesday, at JYSK ( Whatever , I said). But when she ordered it, JYSK called back to say that they were really low on stock, and that the stock they did have was damaged, and

glamour, by extension

C is friends with the fashion stylist Rebekah Roy (left in both pics above) ... one of those people who personify calm and smiling success. On her blog she presents glamour in this very sincere, straightforward way ... whether she's taking pictures of people on the street , talking about stain removers , her favourite videos , or attending some glittering party . One minute she's ruminating on hair extensions, and in the next she reveals how she's been featured on the Vogue UK site. A real disarmer and charmer (and this without meeting her yet, although I feel like I know her because we both did our time in Winnipeg). * * * * * Coming home from Russia, we did many bad things. ; mixed media on canvas, 10 x 10 inches. In my own life, the glamour is wholly imagined. * * * * * witches, smoke ; mixed media on canvas, 10 x 10 inches. My second go at this one, and for some reason I'm painting a lot of smoke lately (note to self: tell C that I want to be cremated). *