Skip to main content

returns

I remember, from a million years ago, attending a guest lecture by some photographer who put on a slide show of all the work he'd burned. In fact, he'd burned it all at once, in an attempt to be rid of it. The reaction of the crowd was somewhere between traumatized and offended, but these were mostly students and still of that (precious) mindset that all art is precious.

I used to love burning the garbage as a kid.

Mend or end; sometimes you can do both. Or at least see the end and plan for it. I've got roughly five months to deal with everything in my studio, not least of which is all this artwork, so I've started painting over some of the smaller pieces, in order to give them one last go. Again, people's reaction to this is usually bad but I don't see it as anything lost or defeated. Rather, only as things that had their day and, for whatever reason, did not work, or were not wanted (if you conceive of the art 'economy' as being based more on the wages of happiness/meaning, then you could classify these kind of works as returns).

At any rate I don't have access to a fire pit or a burning barrel.

Comments

  1. There is this idea that "art" should last forever, but I am with you. Let it have its season just like nature. Save some and let the rest become something else.

    ReplyDelete
  2. some of my so called art gets recycled. I make journal covers, bookmarks etc. But the large oil paintings..sigh..they take up room in the studio and are going no where. I might take my Hubby's saws all and cut out the bits I like and bonfire the rest to oblivion ....

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous3:54 pm

    I LOVED your paintings of Merle Pace with the feathers in her hair!!! but was too late in getting in on a chance buying one...Please, paint another over one of your other ones?

    ReplyDelete
  4. what choice do you have? it's depressing when you can't even give stuff away. sometimes i donate it to the goodwill. a lot gets trashed. burning is fun, i usually save that for my writing

    ReplyDelete
  5. I've recently learned (at age 35, I wonder if that's old for this lesson) that artists destroy and cover up and re-do and undo things one thousand times over in a span of their career. Sometimes in the span of one piece

    It makes me sad, but gives me hope. I always thought that because I couldn't sit down and create something wonderful in a half an hour I sucked at art.

    I don't think I suck at art.

    Besides, art isn't all about what you end up with. I don't think. I'm not sure. I don't know.

    I sort of think that art is more about the doing than it is the finished product.

    Doing art is more important than keeping art.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

glamour, by extension

C is friends with the fashion stylist Rebekah Roy (left in both pics above) ... one of those people who personify calm and smiling success. On her blog she presents glamour in this very sincere, straightforward way ... whether she's taking pictures of people on the street , talking about stain removers , her favourite videos , or attending some glittering party . One minute she's ruminating on hair extensions, and in the next she reveals how she's been featured on the Vogue UK site. A real disarmer and charmer (and this without meeting her yet, although I feel like I know her because we both did our time in Winnipeg). * * * * * Coming home from Russia, we did many bad things. ; mixed media on canvas, 10 x 10 inches. In my own life, the glamour is wholly imagined. * * * * * witches, smoke ; mixed media on canvas, 10 x 10 inches. My second go at this one, and for some reason I'm painting a lot of smoke lately (note to self: tell C that I want to be cremated). *

the indisputable weight of the ocean

People are always telling me that my work is too dark. So I've put up this sunnier story, but even it has a shadow, as its original publisher – a fine Atlantic Canadian literary magazine called the Gaspereau Review – is no longer in business. ---------------- It was a simple enough thing and that thing was simply this: Edmund Kelley was a gentleman. Of course his mom called him her 'little gentleman', as in 'Oh Edmund, you are my perfect little gentleman,' which did seem to hold to a certain logic that these type of things often follow, considering her affection for him and the fact that he was, after all, only ten years old. Still, Edmund himself was not particularly fond of the diminutive aspect of that title. Gentleman was enough; gentleman summed up the whole thing rather nicely, thank you. He was definitely a more refined version of your average child. He lived in a state of perpetual Sunday m

Oona Balloona (doesn't care about new tables)

Well, it's Friday, and since I'm pretty depleted in the chit-chat department, I might as well put up some pictures of Ol' Giggles At Ghosts before Grandma starts sending me hate mail. Man, what a goofball. At this rate it's going to be, like, eighteen years before she has gainful employment and moves out of the house. I mean, come on . * * * * * C is especially crazy and frantic today. About two months ago she decided that she no longer liked our dining room table (take that, dining room table! no more BFF for you!). Since then she's switched the dining room and kitchen table (and all the rest of the furniture in the house -- about thirty times, but that's another story) as a provisional solution while she scoured area stores for an upgrade. And she thought she had found one, on Wednesday, at JYSK ( Whatever , I said). But when she ordered it, JYSK called back to say that they were really low on stock, and that the stock they did have was damaged, and